Sports betting, good or bad?

I asked Gemini about how much Americans are losing to sports betting in 2026. I have never placed a bet this way, I used to go to Vegas in the ’80s and would limit my losses to 100 bucks a trip. It was my version of paying for entertainment.

Americans are expected to lose an estimated $12 billion to $14 billion on legal sports betting in 2026. This aggregate loss, known as Gross Gaming Revenue (GGR), reflects the difference between the total money wagered and the amount paid out in winnings. The aggregate GGR across all legal forms of gambling (including sports betting and iGaming) regularly tops $130 billion annually.

Driven by a higher average “hold” percentage for sportsbooks—which recently rose from roughly 9.3% to over 11%—and monthly handles regularly exceeding $13 billion to $15 billion, Americans are actively losing billions each month to sportsbooks.

The financial impact extends beyond direct betting losses, bringing broader consequences for household wealth:

  • Investment Reduction: Studies show that for every dollar deposited into a sports betting app, users reduce their traditional investment and brokerage deposits by about 20 cents.
  • Credit Impacts: Research indicates that the legalization of online sports betting increases household bankruptcy filings by up to 28% and raises loan/credit card delinquencies as consumers chase losses.
  • New Tax Burdens: Tax law changes are impacting bettors nationwide, as federal caps on gambling deductions force many to pay taxes on “phantom income” generated by winnings, even if their year-end totals result in a net loss.

A frontier without an ecosystem is not stable

This is from Satya Nadella, CEO of Microsoft. This text is all from his post on X.com.

I’ve been thinking a lot about the future of the firm in an AI-driven economy.

This transition is different than any previous platform shift. In the past, we used digital systems to enhance human capital. This is the first time we can create a real cognitive loop between people and digital systems. That is a mind-bender, because it changes how we even conceptualize work inside an enterprise.

What is at stake is not some digital tool or system and its use, but how organizations continue to learn, build IP, differentiate, and thrive in a world where AI models can continuously absorb the expertise of humans and organizations and commoditize it.

Every company is going to have to build what I think of as human capital and token capital. Human capital comprises the knowledge, judgment, relationships, ingenuity, and pattern recognition of its people, while token capital is the firm’s AI capability it builds and owns.

Importantly, human capital does not become less valuable as token capital grows. It only becomes more valuable! I believe human agency will be the driver of token capital growth. Humans will set ambitious goals, connect dots across domains, build relationships, and recognize patterns that matter most. Without human direction, you have compute running in circles.

This means the real opportunity is not in picking the best model but instead in building a learning loop on top of models where human capital and token capital compound. You can offload a task, or even a job, but you can never offload your learning. The future of the firm is the ability to compound that learning across people and AI.

This requires a new architectural approach where every business is able to build agentic systems that improve over time, while still retaining control over their IP. A company should be able to switch out a “generalist” model without losing the “company veteran” expertise built into their learning system. This is the key “test” of your control and sovereignty in the era ahead.

Companies need to turn their workflows, domain knowledge, and accumulated judgment into AI systems that improve with each use. Private evals should capture whether a model is actually improving against outcomes that matter to the business (not just external benchmarks!). Private reinforcement learning environments should let models grow stronger on real traces from inside the organization. Its knowledge base makes institutional memory queryable and use of tokens more efficient.

This loop becomes the new IP of the firm. I think of it as a hill climbing machine. And unlike most assets, it compounds. Every improved workflow generates better training signal, which accelerates the accumulation of tacit knowledge unique to the firm. The companies that build this early will have an advantage that is hard to replicate, regardless of any new individual model capability.

The last thing any of us want is a world where every company across every sector is ceding value to a few models that eat everything they see. If all the value is accrued by only a few models, the political economy will simply not tolerate it. There is no societal permission for an AI future that hollows out entire industries.

Think about what happened in the first phase of globalization where entire industrial economies were hollowed out by outsourcing. The GDP numbers looked fine on the surface, but the displacement was real and the consequences are still being felt. Let us not bring that dynamic into the AI era, with a small number of AI systems capturing all the economic returns, while entire industries find their knowledge commoditized right out from underneath them.

In my view, our priority has to be building a frontier ecosystem, not just a frontier model, so value flows broadly across every company, every industry, and every country. One where every organization can own the learning loop that encodes its institutional knowledge, compounding its human and token capital.

This is the ethos I’ve grown up with where platforms enable more value on top than is captured inside, and where every company can continuously innovate and build value of its own.

When that happens, companies will create value for themselves and for the economy around them. Employees will see their expertise amplified and their judgment become part of systems that make it replicable and scalable and the benefits accrue to the companies and communities around them.

That is how companies drive value for themselves and the broader economy. And it is the stable equilibrium we should build together.